More Damming Evidence On Norway’s Complicity Taking Out Nord Stream…

Time to Pay Attention Folks! For such times as this I really do miss Paul Harvey and his “And Now For the Rest of the Story.” But rest assured, the two recent Seymour Hersh’s news clips I posted are now elevating Paul Harvey’s original concept several Quantum Leaps; and just-in-time-too! Do not be deceived. Truth ultimately prevails!

Lyndon B. Johnson delivering his televised report on the Gulf of Tonkin incident, August 4, 1964.

Why Norway? In my account of the Biden Administration’s decision to destroy the Nord Stream pipelines, why did much of the secret planning and training for the operation take place in Norway? And why were highly skilled seamen and technicians from the Norwegian Navy involved?

The simple answer is that the Norwegian Navy has a long and murky history of cooperation with American intelligence. Five months ago that teamwork—about which we still know very little—resulted in the destruction of two pipelines, on orders of President Biden, with international implications yet to be determined. And six decades ago, so the histories of those years have it, a small group of Norwegian seamen were entangled in a presidential deceit that led to an early—and bloody—turning point in the Vietnam war.

After the Second World War, ever prudent Norway invested heavily in the construction of large, heavily armed fast attack boats to defend its 1,400 miles of Atlantic Ocean coastline. These vessels were far more effective than the famed American PT boat that was ennobled in many a postwar movie. These boats were known as “Nasty-class,” for their powerful gunnery, and some of them were sold to the US Navy. According to reporting in Norway, by early 1964 at least two Norwegian sailors confessed to their involvement in CIA-led clandestine attacks along the North Vietnam coast. Other reports, never confirmed, said the Norwegian patrol boats where manned by Norwegian officers and crew. What was not in dispute was that the American goal was to put pressure on the leadership in North Vietnam to lessen its support of the anti-American guerrillas in South Vietnam. The strategy did not work.

None of this was known at the time to the American public. And the Norwegians would keep the secret for decades. The CIA’s lethal game of cat-and-mouse warfare led to a failed attack on August 2, 1964, with three North Vietnamese gunships engaging two American destroyers—the USS Maddox and the USS Turner Joy—on a large body of contested water known as the Gulf of Tonkin that straddled both North and South Vietnam.

Two days later, with the destroyers still intact, the commander of the Maddox cabled his superiors that he was under a torpedo attack. It was a false alarm, and he soon rescinded the report. But the American signals intelligence community—under pressure from Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, who was doing President Johnson’s bidding—looked the other way as McNamara ignored the second cableand Johnson told the American public there was evidence that North Vietnam had attacked an American destroyer. Johnson and McNamara had found a way to take the war to North Vietnam. 

Johnson’s nationally televised speech on the evening of August 4, 1964, is chilling in its mendacity, especially when one knows what was to come.

“This new act of aggression,” he said, “aimed directly at our own forces, again brings home to all of us in the United States the importance of the struggle for peace and security in Southeast Asia. Aggression by terror against the peaceful villagers of South Vietnam has now been joined by open aggression on the high seas against the United States of America.” 

Public anger swelled, and Johnson authorized the first American bombing of the North. A few days later Congress passed the Tonkin Gulf Resolution with only two dissenting votes, giving the president the right to deploy American troops and use military force in South Vietnam in any manner he chose. And so it went on for the next eleven years, with 58,000 American deaths and millions of Vietnamese deaths to come.

The Norwegian navy, as loyal allies in the Cold War, stayed mum, and over the next few years, according to further reporting in Norway, sold eighteen more of their Nasty Class patrol boats to the U.S. Navy. Six were destroyed in combat.

In 2001, Robert J. Hanyok, a historian at the National Security Agency, published Skunks, Bogies, Silent Hounds, and the Flying Fish: The Gulf of Tonkin Mystery, 2–4 August 1964,a definitive study of the events in the gulf, including the manipulation of signals intelligence. He revealed that 90 percent of the relevant intercepts, including those from the North Vietnamese, had been kept out the NSA’s final reports on the encounter and thus were not provided to the Congressional committees that later investigated the abuse that led America deeper into the Vietnam War.

That is the public record as it stands. But, as I have learned from a source in the US intelligence community, there is much more to know. The first batch of Norwegian patrol boats meant for the CIA’s undeclared war against the North Vietnamese actually numbered six. They landed in early 1964 at a Vietnamese naval base in Danang, eighty-five miles south of the border between North and South Vietnam. The ships had Norwegian crews and Norwegian Navy officers as their captains. The declared mission was to teach American and Vietnamese sailors how to operate the ships. The vessels were under the control of a long-running CIA-directed series of attacks against coastal targets inside North Vietnam. The secret operation was controlled by the Joint Chiefs of Staff in Washington and not by the American command in Saigon, which was then headed by Army General William Westmoreland. That shift was deemed essential because there was another aspect of the undeclared war against the North that was sacrosanct. US Navy SEALs were assigned to the mission with a high-priority list of far more aggressive targets that included heavily defended North Vietnamese radar facilities.

It was a secret war within a secret war. I was told that at least two SEALs were ambushed by the North Vietnamese and severely wounded in a fire fight. Both men managed to make their way to the coast and were eventually rescued. Both men were awarded the Medal of Honor, America’s highest decoration, in secret.

There also were far less dramatic movements as the war unraveled. At some later date, it was decided to arm bats with incendiary devices and drop them, by air, over areas of high interest in the south. The release came at high altitude, and the bats quickly froze to death.

This bit of top secret and heretofore unknown history raises, to this reporter, an obvious question: what else do we not know about the secret operation in Norway that led to the destruction of the pipelines? And is there anyone in the Senate and the House, or in the American press, interested in finding out what was going on—and what else we do not know?

 The link below opens the video clips for your review and start your seven day free trial.

https://open.substack.com/pub/seymourhersh/p/from-the-gulf-of-tonkin-to-the-baltic?r=690o5&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

How America Took Out the Nord Stream Pipeline

Seymour Hersh Feb 8, 2023

The New York Times called it a “mystery,” but the United States executed a covert sea operation that was kept secret—until now. Seymour Hersh Feb 8

I’ve been busy and unavailable to blog. Some of you may not yet be familiar with these details. Isn’t it unique how truth usually prevails? Be it good, bad, perhaps even ugly! Click the link below to read.

https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream

AI interface ChatGPT released 11/30/22. SO WHAT?

FEBRUARY 2023SCIENCE, NATURE & TECHNOLOGY

A.I. Yai-Yai

A.I. Yai-Yai

Tech Commentary 

by James B. Meigs

Fans of 2001 and the Terminator movies aren’t the only people worried about artificial intelligence. In 2014, Elon Musk (no enemy of technology) told the Guardian he thought artificial intelligence might be “our biggest existential threat.” Researchers developing AI systems could be “summoning the demon,” he said. Well, now the demon is here, and it wants to say hi. On November 30, 2022, the conversational AI interface ChatGPT was made available to the public. Today, anyone can ask it to write poems, explain quantum physics, compose letters, write computer code, or do their homework. Is this a good thing?

Throughout history, technological innovations—from the mechanical loom to the automobile to the microchip—have disrupted societies even as they brought enormous advantages.

Conservatives generally look askance at sweeping changes that upset the social order. At the same time, they tend to support advances that empower the individual. So should conservatives celebrate the democratization of this world-changing breakthrough? Or should they be standing athwart history yelling stop?

Here’s my take:

Artificial intelligence has the potential to bring numerous benefits to society, and conservatives should embrace it as a valuable tool for improving economic growth, national security, social welfare, and personal freedom. One reason conservatives should embrace AI is its ability to create new industries and job opportunities, and to enhance the performance of existing businesses. Another is its potential to enhance national security. AI can be used to improve situational awareness and decision-making in a variety of contexts, such as detecting and responding to potential threats. Finally, AI can be used to automate tasks and make our lives easier, freeing up time and resources for other pursuits. This can enhance personal freedom and allow individuals to pursue their own interests and passions.

Does this take on AI strike you as somewhat rote? A bit mechanical even? Well congratulate yourself. You have just demonstrated a skill we will all need to cherish from this day forward: the ability to tell when the person talking to you is actually a machine. Because I did not write the paragraph above. Those serviceable if pedestrian sentiments were generated by ChatGPT after I typed in the prompt: “Please explain why conservatives should embrace AI.” (I condensed it slightly.)

You’ve probably been hearing a lot about ChatGPT in the past few weeks. The brainy chatbot is just the latest platform made public by the AI research group OpenAI. Spurred in part by worries about the risks of artificial intelligence, Musk and the young tech-startup guru Sam Altman co-founded the firm as a nonprofit in 2015. The founders hoped that OpenAI’s research would promote a kind non-demonic “friendly AI.” Musk left the company in 2018, leaving Altman as CEO. Investment money poured in from Microsoft and others, and today OpenAI is an amalgam of nonprofit and profit-making divisions. But the organization’s stated mission remains “to ensure that artificial general intelligence (AGI)—by which we mean highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work—benefits all of humanity.”

The artificial general intelligence that OpenAI describes in its mission statement doesn’t actually exist today. AI pioneer IBM defines it as “a theoretical form of AI where a machine would have an intelligence equaled to humans; it would have a self-aware consciousness that has the ability to solve problems, learn, and plan for the future.” This is the kind of capability, often called “Strong AI,” that scares the bejeezus out most of us. Do we really want our digital servants to be self-aware and planning for the future? What future? Are there humans in it? ChatGPT and other current AI systems are nowhere near that level of competence. Still, they can get close enough to be a little creepy.

It’s important to understand that even basic AI systems are much more than super-powerful computers; they are super-powerful computers that can learn. ChatGPT and similar systems employ a partially self-directed approach known as deep learning. If you want an AI system to learn the difference between cats and dogs, for example, you feed it thousands of pictures labeled “cat” and thousands of pictures tagged “dog” and let the system figure out the features that distinguish the two groups. Then you show it more pictures of cats and dogs and have a human operator tell the computer whether it identified them correctly. With enough cycles through this process, AI systems can get incredibly good at tasks like, say, identifying a tree from the image of a single leaf.

For an AI system designed to communicate with humans, the best way to learn is by interacting with as many people as possible. That’s why it makes sense for OpenAI to make ChatGPT available to the public. AI systems have been around for years, used in everything from credit card fraud detection to the Google Lens image-identification app. But OpenAI’s platforms are among the first to give nonprofessionals the ability to create content using AI tools. Within less than a week, ChatGPT was attracting a million users a day. And with each interaction, the system gets smarter. For now, the platform is available for free. But perhaps not for long. “We will have to monetize it somehow at some point,” Altman recently warned, noting that the cost of crunching all that data is “eye-watering.” 

ChatGPT has already begun disrupting established fields. The system is especially good at writing the kind of workaday prose that constitutes most written communication: business memos, simple news stories, student reports. “We are witnessing the end of the college essay in real time,” Google strategist Cory Wang writes. Feed ChatGPT a typical essay question, Wang shows, and it will crank out “solid A- work in 10 seconds.” The chatbot’s responses aren’t beautifully written or strikingly original, but they aren’t meant to be. Prior to being released to the public, the system digested 300 billion words from textbooks, newspapers, academic papers, and other supposedly reliable sources. Its job is not to come up with fresh new insights, but to produce seamless simulacra of that material. A great deal of high school and college academic work involves those sorts of dutiful restatements of the conventional wisdom.

The libertarian-leaning author Virginia Postrel predicts that AI platforms will drive huge productivity gains in fields that rely on written communication. “Instead of writing boilerplate memos, managers will soon assign them to bots,” she writes. The opportunities to automate routine communications are limitless. On Twitter, one doctor demonstrates how he uses ChatGPT to compose letters to insurance companies asking them to cover certain tests his patients need. In seconds, the chatbot generates a flawless—and persuasive—email, complete with citations to the relevant medical literature. Imagine similar efficiencies when it comes to tasks such as writing legal briefs, short news articles, or financial reports. Expect to see the same sorts of gains in other labor-intensive fields including animation, video games, or computer software.

Historically, we’ve seen new technologies replace low-skill jobs, especially those requiring human brawn. Farm tractors put field hands out of work, and diesel engines eliminated jobs for coal shovelers on trains and ships. The AI revolution will instead target relatively high-skill jobs. For example, it takes over a decade of training to become a licensed radiologist. But in a recent study, an AI system outperformed human doctors in reading mammograms, reducing both false negative and false positive findings. Jobs that entail skilled but repetitive work probably face the biggest challenges. A computer developer recently produced a YouTube video showing how ChatGPT can be used to write basic computer code. “I’m really scared,” another coder responded in the comments. “I’m working out how to handle my future job as a mover or farmer.”

Any free-market economist will tell you this is all for the good. Allowing AI systems to take over repetitive intellectual chores will simply make professionals in those fields more productive. A good computer programmer will work many times faster with the help of code-writing bots. A doctor who spends less time writing emails to insurance companies will have more time to see patients. Lawyers will be able to serve more clients. And so on. Moreover, the automation of routine tasks will allow these professionals to wring more value out of their hard-earned expertise. People will be paid for the unique talent and ideas they bring to the table, not for their hours of grunt work.

That all sounds promising. After all, historically, jobs eliminated by new technologies have been replaced by better jobs. Not too many of us wish we could go back to the days when most people worked in fields or factories. But the changes wrought by AI are going to come at a ferocious pace. It took over a quarter century for the automobile to replace both the horse and the huge workforce employed in tending to those horses. AI will transform many knowledge industries in a matter of years, even months. A few top law firms might benefit from a huge boost in productivity. The general-practice attorney who makes a decent living handling wills and real-estate contracts probably won’t. Many of the jobs disrupted will be in fields where workers are accustomed to social status and political influence. Remember: The same AI system that can write college papers will be able to grade college papers. Brace yourself for howls of anguish across elite institutions.

On the other hand, the AI revolution might help some groups who tend to get left behind by technological progress. It takes years to learn how to write standard business prose. Many Americans never do, and that holds them back. But now the small-business owner who never went to college (or whose English is spotty) will be able to send perfectly composed emails to customers. The unjustly sentenced prisoner will be able to petition the court with well-reasoned legal arguments. For many such people, AI will be a great equalizer.

However, one group’s power will be massively enhanced by the rise of artificial intelligence: the people who control the leading AI platforms. OpenAI says its mission is to produce a “safe and beneficial” version of AI. But whose definition of “safe and beneficial” does it employ? When prodding ChatGPT with prompts, it doesn’t take long to discern the hidden value system embedded in the software. If you ask it to create a conspiracy theory about some topic, it will refuse. Ask it to make up a joke about “Americans,” and it will make a weak attempt at humor. Ask it to do the same about “Mexicans,” and the bot won’t respond. Clearly, the programmers want to keep their platform free of what they see as bias, conspiracy kookiness, and other moral contagions. Their concern is understandable (an AI system that churned out and constantly refined conspiracy theories would be scary indeed). But, like a car with a faulty alignment, ChatGPT’s algorithms seem to constantly steer it to the left.

Relax now as you contemplate man’s frivolous short sighted attempt at intelligence while listening to two of my favorite hymns; the latter, Ten Thousand Reasons, as played at the memorial service of the late Brian Stoltzfus, who flew into glory Jan 21, 2019.

Bono & Eugene Peterson Interview 2015 : THE PSALMS

Eugene H. Peterson, (1932-2018) was a pastor, scholar, author and poet. He wrote more than thirty books, including his widely acclaimed paraphrase of the Bible, The Message; and numerous works of spiritual formation, including Run with the Horses, and A Long Obedience in the Same Direction.

Paul David Hewson, whose stage name is Bono, was born May 10, 1960 is the lead singer of the Irish rock band U2 and one of the most talented performers in the history of rock and roll. While still in high school, Bono and his three friends formed a band, practiced a lot, innovated a unique sound, topped the pop charts, sold 44 million albums, won 22 Grammys, and got inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

All the while, Bono founded multiple charities, met with world leaders, advocated tirelessly to fight global poverty and disease, and was named Time magazine’s Person of the Year in 2005 sharing the title with none other than computer billionaire, Bill Gates and his wife, Melinda. Times honored Bono for having “charmed and bullied and morally blackmailed the leaders of the world’s richest countries into forgiving $40 billion in debt owed by the poorest.” Time began choosing a “Man of the Year” in 1927, to pick the “person or persons who most affected the news and our lives, for good or ill, and embodied what was important about the year, for better or for worse.” Hitler was named in 1938 and Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979.

FYI, Charles Lindbergh (1927) was the first and youngest person to receive the Time distinction at 25 years old. Recent winners in 2018 were The Guardians and the War on Truth, 2019 Greta Thunberg, and the final persons to receive the award evidently since no one was named in either ’21 or ’22, was Joe Biden and Kamala Harris in 2020. Certainly more trivia than necessary!

The clip below is a 21 minute interview featuring the connection between Bono and Eugene in the Peterson homestead near Glacier Park and Kalispell MT. Eugene returned to the family homestead after his retirement as a pastor near Laurel MD. His brother was pastor of the Fredericksburg Presbyterian Church although I am not aware of the years he served there. Enjoy.

Consider these words, lest we be further deceived in the lateness of the hour…

Genesis 9:1-17 The Message Bible

[1-4] God blessed Noah and his sons: He said, “Prosper! Reproduce! Fill the Earth! Every living creature— birds, animals, fish— will fall under your spell and be afraid of you. You’re responsible for them. All living creatures are yours for food; just as I gave you the plants, now I give you everything else. Except for meat with its lifeblood still in it— don’t eat that.

[5] “But your own lifeblood I will avenge; I will avenge it against both animals and other humans.

[6-7] Whoever sheds human blood, by humans let his blood be shed, Because God made humans in his image reflecting God’s very nature. You’re here to bear fruit, reproduce, lavish life on the Earth, live bountifully!”

[8-11] Then God spoke to Noah and his sons: “I’m setting up my covenant with you including your children who will come after you, along with everything alive around you-birds, farm animals, wild animals-that came out of the ship with you. I’m setting up my covenant with you that never again will everything living be destroyed by floodwaters; no, never again will a flood destroy the Earth.”

[12-16] God continued, “This is the sign of the covenant I am making between me and you and everything living around you and everyone living after you. I’m putting my rainbow in the clouds, a sign of the covenant between me and the Earth. From now on, when I form a cloud over the Earth and the rainbow appears in the cloud, I’ll remember my covenant between me and you and everything living, that never again will floodwaters destroy all life. When the rainbow appears in the cloud, I’ll see it and remember the eternal covenant between God and everything living, every last living creature on Earth.”

[17] And God said, “This is the sign of the covenant that I’ve set up between me and everything living on the Earth.” …

These 17 verses cover the ocean front today for many of our cultures misconceptions read and heard as official proclamations, perhaps even science. Our hearts are saddened when God’s sacred profound symbols such as the rainbow, are repurposed as possibly profane cultural religiosity whims. Consider how man’s lustful desire for sex has trivialized God’s plan for marriage and sanctity of life.

“Deliver my soul, O Lord, from lying lips, and from a deceitful tongue” (Psalm 120:2).

“One of the hardest things on earth to bear is deception, especially when it comes from friends. We do not need the grace of God to stand the deception or slander of an enemy; human pride will stand that; but to be wounded in the house of our friends takes us unaware.” Oswald Chambers The Highest Good – The Pilgrim’s Song Book, 527 L

Belated Birthday Bunny Burrow Blooper = “What is Truth?”

Birthday Letter to my dear sister Verla Louise Erb Hochstetler:

Dear Sis!

On the day of, available only for your reading by email, I was stricken by seeing Dec 17 in print as if I were Rip Van Winkle awakening from a 20 year nap when I opened the devotional Utmost upon arising this morning, after I had read your email from cousin Linda describing Arlene’s condition amidst the severity of your MN weather conditions.

Surely not again this year, I thought to myself, after forgetting your birthday last year! What’s the deal with me anyway? That indeed is simply the malfunctioning of my mind and its inability to distinguish timely facts from trivial personal self centered fiction, a sad commentary indeed. But definitely a more frequently  observed reality as is continually documented by my loving but frustrated wife of soon 49 years, who is still waiting for me to really wake up and smell her  roses, some in full bloom, others still budding.

I’ll not deny it. I am consumed. By much that are trivial pursuits, even for the guy with 3-4 3×5 cards stapled together clipped to a pen in my shirt pocket. I tried getting organized on my phone but it just never took for this old-schooler that hunts and pecks his messages likely infuriating my three sons who deftly type so swiftly and accurately with their thumbs. Not likely to happen with me anymore! Actually my techie adventure went on life support or hospice care when my eldest son Ben became my “techie advisor” as a young teen replacing both me and Bob Geiser, my Lotus programmer. Fleetingly and addictively during those simpler times, I never once realizing the magnitude of the all encompassing facets of the “descending (not necessarily an ascending) revolution that in 4 decades would devolve into today’s globalist narrative and agenda where by “2030 we would indeed own nothing and be happy,” presumably as we all are rehabbed into mindless robots while being “matrix-ingly pilled.”

In summary Sis, Alexander Graham Bell’s 1844 quote “What hath God wrought?” comes to mind after being the first message sent via his newly invented telegraph, and may I add, is still yet illuminating for us slow learners, the “wrought” part! For example, a few years later on the night of August 28, 1859 after two successive solar storms struck, numerous telegraph operators were able to operate without batteries for two hours. Fires even started in telegraph offices because of the Carrington Event (solar flare) caused by a major electro magnetic pulse (EMF). Google Carrington Event for details.

Understand the uniqueness of this telegraph message from the perspective as this, was I believe the first time in history man was able to communicate from two locations in real time. That was the humble beginning of the digital age which has now progressed with AI ( Artificial Intelligence) to unimaginable levels, one rather insignificant example being producing  political and entertainment clones digitally that we viewers are unable to determine which is the real deal. Actually, such “science” launches a whole new dimension for Pilate’s question when pondering the fate of Jesus – “What is truth?” Regrettably, most earthlings, even some Christ-Follower’s, are still dodging that bullet having never recognized the question was even asked of them.

This media ignored extreme vulnerability from EMF’s today for our culture’s global electronic connectedness from today’s observable and either anticipated “maturing” of our solar system or by such as the globalist’s manipulations or intentional war, indeed elevates the above mentioned AG Bell’s quote and his prolific file of quotes, and especially so with what is now known in 2022 about EMF’s, to be a very interesting read for truth oriented inquiring minds in both “rubber on the road theological circles” or even the largely ignored, at least unguarded scientific reviews.

So Sis, what a bunny trail your birthday did elicit from your warped brother’s mind today! I do hope you’ll be spared many similar onslaughts from other friends and family today. Hopefully they’ll all be the  more traditional encouragements and congratulations.

Happy 71st Birthday Sis! You are an amazing woman. Indeed a tribute to your mother’s perspective of life. God Bless.

Your brother merlin     

Another Ever Present Danger: The War on Work

I found this interesting article, The War on Work, from the Politics & Ideas section of the November issue of the Commentary on my desk this morning, sent me again by my friend Chuck. Written by Barbara Swaim, an editorial-page writer to the Wall Street Journal, she presents a historical sketch of work’s evolvement up to the current mass exodus from the working world, dubbed as the “Great Resignation” by economists.

Swaim mentions Nicholas Eberstadt’s 2016 book “Men Without Work” and it’s post-pandemic reissue of the book. She limits her broad comments to four sectors: government, higher education, consultancy, and nonprofit. Earthy in her perspective, she offers her father’s 25 years of operating a small ocean front SC lodge as an example of the core of dignified work: It blesses someone else. In fact, the first to work with a meaning and an end was God Himself.

Swaim draws from such as Tocqueville, Marx, the 1991 film “Slacker;” even Jonathan Swift’s memorable parodies of Lemuel Gulliver vain delusions while visiting the Academy of Lagado. She identifies that much of the confusion today in the four sectors she examines, arise from a misunderstanding of what their markets are. Markets are the oldest and commonest way to distinguish between things that have value and things that don’t.

Unquestionably, this article is way beyond my norm, and I think that is good. I need to mentally stretch daily. Neither do I recall a sermon recently on the attributes of work, though many imply attachments. Hence, I’ll open this can of worms. Understand though, these worms have no nutritional value, if that thought even crossed your mind!

Click on the link below to open the article. Be warned the article though long, is easily and effectively skimmed.

My Two Cents About Complacency, Urgency and Differing Opinions as Fueled by PA Amish farmer, Amos Miller

David asked Ahimelek, “Don’t you have a spear or a sword here? I haven’t brought my swords or any other weapons, because the king’s mission was urgent.” I Samuel 21:8 (NIV)

In no way today, am I advocating securing physical weapons to combat the offensive evil in our culture. I employed this verse because it implies urgency, in fact, David evidently was separated from his weapons when he got the urgent message necessitating his request of Ahimelek. So we today, are being lulled into complacency not realizing the approaching hour, and even though we Christ Follower’s (CF’s) are continually Spirit empowered and embolden as detailed in Ephesians 6:10-18 and always ready to be engaged, or to give an account…. Perhaps our non resistant culture has been so effectively euthanized by the both church and secular media we’ve become clueless of our 1.) spiritual reality, 2.) resources (remember people + prayer + His Presence = POWER), 3.) its transforming results, and 4.) then experiencing the restoration.

The question today is not merely “fight or flight” as with David’s request for weapons, but pushes us out much further far beyond fight or flight, to effectively encountering differing opinions, a lost art today. Perhaps the clip below serves as another example of our rich cultural legacy loosing its luster, and now, more or less, relegated to an enduring confining complacency.

Somewhere as a child or a teen, I read accounts that the underground CF’s, long before the anabaptists emerged, being frequently skilled artisans and educated, having fled the persecution in the cities and villages, taking refuge in the desolate areas of Europe becoming simple peasant farmers who in time, were credited with playing a major role in eroding the continuation of the Dark Ages because these observant focused scientific agriculturists flourished sufficiently providing sustenance to free others from food production to begin the innovative steps needed to birth the Industrial Revolution. They were the leaders in improving the breeds of milk and meat animals, but only by simple selection. They advocated crop rotation and the use of legumes, all of which is still being practiced on the Amos Miller’s farm.

Therefore, I read with interest the clip below also listening to the Tucker Carlson interview realizing now that both the church and our culture is in the process of reverting to the Dark Ages under the guise of a “Reset.” And yes, isn’t it interesting that agriculture and the church are both still the key components? To either flourish, as Christ established His church, or to “control” food production, just to eliminate billions of us. Even Communist China understands food production better than we Americans. Look at the stats on their stockpiling of commodities vs ours, and their refusal to practice the globalist insanity as did NA and Europe; but their absolute delight that we have so embraced this “Reset,” fueling their desire to “rent” our exquisite cropland ASAP.

John Kotter of the Harvard Business School, author of 21 books, in his 1996 book”Leading Change,” and his 2002 book “The Heart of Change,” describes his eight stage model developing urgency as an essential element for those wanting to be successful, for most people are more complacent than they realize. “Insufficient urgency,” he writes, “with all its consequences, can be found in winners and losers, businesses and governments. It can undermine a plant, an office, or a whole country. Conversely, in all of these situations, a high sense of urgency can help produce results, and a whole way of life.”

Need I say more? Just my two cents folks! I rest my case. Enjoy the clip. FYI, I’m planning to open the blog this week for your comments. It is time we burst the imposed bubble we’re in and begin actually communicating. However, please do so only in complete “wholeness!” Listen to Pastor Craig’s message from today on “Differing Opinions” on the Kidron Mennonite website for such “wholeness” details.

Blessings on your journey this week!

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/amish-farmer-threatened-by-us-govt-shines-light-on-the-suppression-of-non-processed-foods/

Pertinent Admonitions for Christ Followers in Days of Unfettered Chaos While Mass Psychosis Abounds…

Oct 12 Reading from The One Year Bible: The Message Version.

Thessalonians 5:1-28 MSG

[1-3] I don’t think, friends, that I need to deal with the question of when all this is going to happen. You know as well as I that the day of the Master’s coming can’t be posted on our calendars. He won’t call ahead and make an appointment any more than a burglar would. About the time everybody’s walking around complacently, congratulating each other-“We’ve sure got it made! Now we can take it easy!”-suddenly everything will fall apart. It’s going to come as suddenly and inescapably as birth pangs to a pregnant woman.

[4-8] But friends, you’re not in the dark, so how could you be taken off guard by any of this? You’re sons of Light, daughters of Day. We live under wide open skies and know where we stand. So let’s not sleepwalk through life like those others. Let’s keep our eyes open and be smart. People sleep at night and get drunk at night. But not us! Since we’re creatures of Day, let’s act like it. Walk out into the daylight sober, dressed up in faith, love, and the hope of salvation.

[9-11] God didn’t set us up for an angry rejection but for salvation by our Master, Jesus Christ. He died for us, a death that triggered life. Whether we’re awake with the living or asleep with the dead, we’re alive with him! So speak encouraging words to one another. Build up hope so you’ll all be together in this, no one left out, no one left behind. I know you’re already doing this; just keep on doing it.

[12] And now, friends, we ask you to honor those leaders who work so hard for you, who have been given the responsibility of urging and guiding you along in your obedience. Overwhelm them with appreciation and love!

[13-15] Get along among yourselves, each of you doing your part. Our counsel is that you warn the freeloaders to get a move on. Gently encourage the stragglers, and reach out for the exhausted, pulling them to their feet. Be patient with each person, attentive to individual needs. And be careful that when you get on each other’s nerves you don’t snap at each other. Look for the best in each other, and always do your best to bring it out.

[16-18] Be cheerful no matter what; pray all the time; thank God no matter what happens. This is the way God wants you who belong to Christ Jesus to live.

[19-22] Don’t suppress the Spirit, and don’t stifle those who have a word from the Master. On the other hand, don’t be gullible. Check out everything, and keep only what’s good. Throw out anything tainted with evil.

[23-24] May God himself, the God who makes everything holy and whole, make you holy and whole, put you together-spirit, soul, and body-and keep you fit for the coming of our Master, Jesus Christ. The One who called you is completely dependable. If he said it, he’ll do it!

[25-27] Friends, keep up your prayers for us. Greet all the followers of Jesus there with a holy embrace. And make sure this letter gets read to all the brothers and sisters. Don’t leave anyone out.

[28] The amazing grace of Jesus Christ be with you!

Apology First! Admonitions, a Hot Second!

First folks, I made a serious error in my last blog. The quote was actually from Keith Miller, a prolific author beginning his trail of admonitions back when I was a teen with his early on book “Taste of New Wine,” AND not Warren Wiersbe as I stated. Wiersbe was merely quoting the quote crediting Keith Miller. A simple fact my sister had told me correctly but that I failed to fully comprehend! Once again! My excuse is the integral internal liabililities accompanying later stage maturation!

Second, I will pass along an admonition of “later stage observations of future events” for Christ Followers by such as Dr David Jeremiah in his recently released book titled “The World Of The End: How Jesus’ Prophecy Shapes Our Priorities.” I’m halfway thru it on Audible and have ordered hard copy yesterday and highly recommend it for any CF seriously coordinating/reconciling today’s events with Matthew 24, known today as the Olivet Discourse. Today we are learning fear can indeed erode faith, IF we let it. We are learning from experience that staying mentally healthy in a crumbling world is our daily assignment and we can’t do it without a buoyant spiritual foundation for our lives. We need God, we need Christ and His teachings, we need the Holy Spirit and his indwelling, and we need the scriptures and its prophecies about the future.

There is a special scene in the Bible where the teachings of Christ, the inspiration of the HS, and the prophetic words of God, all come together in a gripping chapter that is too often overlooked. We call it the Olivet Discourse from the final week of Jesus’ natural life where he sat with four of his disciples on a ridge on the Mount of Olives where our Lord rolled out the blueprint of the ages, the master plan for the last days, beginning with the shocking prediction of the second massive temple complex tumbling down (which occurred within decades according to the reputable historian Flavius Josephus written accounts from AD 70. See “the destruction of the second temple” in templemount .org/desruct2.html . Actually the Roman soldiers with long iron bars toppled the stones off while reclaiming the melted silver and gold in the temples storehouses that ran down into the temple’s foundations fulfilling Jesus’ prediction. Later then, Jesus gazed forward to the precarious days prior his return in our days ever delivered and it is recorded beginning in Matthew 24-25, Mark 13, and Luke 21.

And as in the infomercials, today there is another admonition!. As encouraged in prior blogs, go to dailylightdevotional.org and select Oct 8 for priceless “approaching end-times” admonitions for CF’s to read and memorize before the Shizzies hit fizzies in our domains. In fact, I suggest you hit your print button so you have hard copy for distribution later if and when we loose internet. Reminds me a tad perhaps of available oil in the ten wise / foolish virgins parable.

“Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents and harmless as doves… (Matt 10:16, KJV) See gotquestions.org/wise

Time to go dig potatoes!!…… merlin